By Scott Carey
Sept. 30, 2016
The UK Ministry of Defence expects to be able to collect data from weapons, vehicles and soldiers into a single place within the next five years and 'operationalise' its use, according to its chief digital and information officer Mike Stone.
Speaking before Splunk's annual conference in Orlando this week, Stone spoke about the importance of better data collection and insight in defence and the potential consequences of being behind the curve.
Stone told ComputerworldUK: "The way I think about it is if we don't get the right insights out of our data then, say companies use data to get a competitive advantage, I use it to get an advantage over our enemies. We need to be able to use it to dominate the information space, because if we don't then we could potentially cede that to others."
Stone is currently in the middle of an ambitious plan to move the MoD to what he calls 'Defence-as-a-Platform' and says that Splunk is an important cog in the project.
Stone wouldn't speak about specific projects but he did posit a situation where the MoD would be able to collect and operationalise machine data from weapons, vehicles and soldiers into a single place.
He said: "It's not a fact today but all of our weapons platforms are increasingly going to be bristling with sensors. I could easily foresee a day when any of our weapons platforms could be polled every twenty seconds to say where they are, what their ammunition state is, what their fuel state is, what their lubrication state is, what their ration state is and what the vital signs are of the people on board.
"That is vast amounts of data, but that is the sort of scale I am talking about. We are dealing increasingly with HD full motion video and being able to parse through that. So you can imagine we will have huge variety, volume and velocity needs of our data."
This would allow the MoD to "plan where best to place maintenance parts, ammunition dumps etcetera" on the fly.
In order to derive this sort of real time insight Stone is reliant on the weapons manufacturers to pay as much credence to sensors and connectivity as he does.
"A lot of the companies have an information systems arm, whether it is BAE, General Dynamics or Northrup Grummond," Stone said.
"What we are seeking to do in this space is to recognise that the lifecycle of an information system is much shorter than the lifecycle of heavy metal. The lifecycle of a warship from concept to disposal may be 40 years but an information system will be three to eight years and it is getting shorter.